Comment #15 on issue 258 by gili.tzabari: [Patch] custom annotation based injection points http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=258
I highly dislike Jose's request. I think the main point of this RFE is that we should be able to integrate with existing annotations used by other frameworks. The fact that this also allows one to implement Jose's request is a side-effect but (my 2 cents) we shouldn't go out of our way to allow individual users to define their own annotations just for the sake of not having Guice's package name show up in their imports. It's a complete waste of our time. So +1 for James' idea and -1 for Jose. Sorry. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
