Comment #17 on issue 258 by gili.tzabari: [Patch] custom annotation based injection points http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=258
Stolsvik, The complaint about having "foreign" package names in your import list is what I find silly about James and your comments. Java isn't a "designed by a committee" language. Many "standards" are de-facto standards that have eventually been folded into the platform. Even C++ development requires one to #include many non-standard namespaces for 3rd-party libraries. Who cares what the package name is? The vast majority of Java libraries out there are *not* by Sun. Nor should they be. Again, I find this whole argument very silly. The package name is not an advertisment. According to JLS section 7.7 one is encourages to take the company domain name (google.com in this case) and reverse it to form the package name. Hence, "com.google". This is no different from sun.com using "com.sun". I don't want to come off as an ass, but this entire argument is highly subjective. I can't say that you are wrong, just that I personally disagree with your view for the reasons I outlined above. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
