On 02/07/10 06:23, Dhanji R. Prasanna wrote: > That pom is only a distribution pom. I think if we change it we should > make it a proper build pom. Greg Kick is the right person to talk to > because he handles our (Google's) official maven repo.
I don't think just before a release is the right time to be contemplating changing the build system from Ant to Maven. I propose that we should stick with distribution-only poms through 3.0, and reassess matters after the release. The first thing we should do is to merge the 2.0-maven branch to trunk (should be a trivial job for a committer), which just adds the distribution poms which were actually used for the 2.0 release. Then, I'd be very happy to write a patch bringing them up to date for 3.0. > On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Sam Berlin <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > I believe there is a pom.xml in guice trunk, but boy is it old... > (referencing 1.0-RC2). As much as I hate dealing with maven, a lot > of people do use it.. so a working pom that can be submitted to a > repository would be great. If you're able to clean it up & make it > stable, that would help with submitting it. > > I know nothing about the grapher extensions, so can't really speak > for it... anyone else know the state of it? It works. For reasons which were never explained, it was not included in the Guice 2.0 release in jar form. Max.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
