Comment #1 on issue 601 by sberlin: requestStaticInjection should not imply
a request for static injection on superclass members
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=601
This would be a pretty large backwards incompatible change (it caused some
problems with Gin recently, too). I could see a helper class doing it.
Something like:
configure() {
requestStaticInjection(SimpleStaticInjector.class);
SimpleStaticInjector.inject(StaticFoo.class);
SimpleStaticInjector.inject(StaticBar.class);
}
SimpleStaticInjector {
List<Class> injections = Lists.newArrayList();
void inject(Class clazz) {
injections.add(clazz);
}
@Inject static doInjections(Injector injector) {
for (Class clazz : injections) {
for (InjectionPoint ip :
InjectionPoint.forStaticMethodsAndFields(clazz)) {
// InjectionPoint's member belongs to the exact class (not a
superclass)
// then run through the logic from
MembersInjectorStore.getInjectors.
// basically:
// if it's a field, get the sole dependency's Key from the injector
// and set the field with it.
// if it's a method, get an instance of each dependency and call the
// method with those instances.
}
}
}
}
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"google-guice-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en.
