Comment #3 on issue 601 by sberlin: requestStaticInjection should not imply a request for static injection on superclass members
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=601
I could probably be convinced, but my thoughts right now are: If the API is enough to let folks write a one-off extension that houses the method, I'd rather not change the current API. Can you confirm that Guice 2.0 (and 1.0) also injected superclasses with requestStaticInjection?
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en.
