Comment #4 on issue 601 by [email protected]: requestStaticInjection should not imply a request for static injection on superclass members
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=601
From what I can tell, Guice 2.0 also injected superclasses, but Guice 1.0 did not. Was that a deliberate change?
And yes, I guess someone could write that code, but it seems like a hack. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en.
