> Other than that I don't think there's anything wrong about trying to get a > solid release together.
Do you feel that many here has advocated to throw a shitty release together? More "community involvement" would have been really nice, with some revision releases, some communicated "date-tag" *releases* (not only svn tags) for community testing of new ideas blahblah, some alphas, betas and release candidates of minor versions, and the same for this major. > And I also agree that you can't work on Guice with 5 > people. This I didn't get at all. There is nearly no project that cannot handle more than one developer. There are always different parts of a system. > Guice is not dead; Jesse has spent a tremendous amount of time and > effort on Guice 2.0, for which we can't thank him enough. Thanks Jesse! I am grateful for Guice and the "new, better twist" on the DI concept it embodies .. when the 2.0 comes, I'll be grateful for that. Endre. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
