On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Bob Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When it comes to versioning schemes, the only thing you can count on is that > no two projects will use exactly the same conventions.
There are some similarities - the scheme mentioned by Gili isn't exactly extremely controversial and unheard-of. > Any tool that cares > about whether two versions are compatible should rely on explicit meta data, > not numbering/naming conventions. I'd be somewhat upset if a revision-increase of some library broke everything in my app. But for a critical production system, I of course agree that you cannot rely on anything except rigorous testing. But this is a bit beside the point, isn't it? > > As for releasing often, we release code every time we check in. A release is a zip/tar.gz package I can download. Endre. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
