On 10/03/2009, gpspassion <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>  Possibly, but I can't see the benefit, if you typed an address you
>  didn't get your map centered on the "wilderness" so it's only hurting
>  those who used the geocoder () function as a parser.

but that was never documented behaviour, so there was no onus to
maintain that feature.

its just a shame the undocumented feature just changed. its still
undocumented that a coord invokes the reverse geocoder (the docs
specifically say that sending a GLatLng as opposed a string will be
reverse geocoded)


>
>  I guess I'm getting what I pay for, i.e. nothing, but it's a bit
>  worrying that Google would just change this out of the blue with no
>  documentation/warning to the people who depend on it. If they had to
>  change it for some reason, they should probably add a "flag" to allow
>  it to work the old way, by default : snapped - snap/off : 1
>
>  Hopefully they will reverse course as they did a couple of weeks ago
>  when the same thing happened, except it was only for a couple of
>  hours...
>
>
>  On Mar 10, 8:07 pm, Rossko <[email protected]> wrote:
>  > > Since sometime last night,  the geocoder no longer works like it used
>  > > to. If you type in a position, it now appears to be "snapped" to a
>  > > road, it can no longer be "in the wilderness"
>  >
>  > That might mean it's working better than it used to from other
>  > people's viewpoint; instead of giving up on a wilderness location it
>  > now finds something nearby.
>  >
>


-- 
Barry

- www.nearby.org.uk - www.geograph.org.uk -

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Maps API" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to