On Mar 15, 4:37 pm, "neil.young" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hmm. Sorry for insisting. I'm not sure with the "particular zoom" claim. > > This is my interpretation, but the Google spec is > very unclear on this.
Precisely. That's why you're being directed away from Google's documentation, which is frankly not good -- I hesitate to say "wrong" -- on this point, and towards the documentation written by the mathematics professor who has figured it all out. What happens if you encode your points using *his* encoder? Are the levels the same? It's possible to tweak some control values if necessary, and you may find that the level-values of the last few points could be improved if it's not right with the default values. I've certainly had no problems with the encoder routine on his pages. It works. See http://www.achurchnearyou.com/parishmap.php?pcode=10/362 -- the southwestern edge of the polygon follows a river. Andrew --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
