Hm, look this , look that, agreement, bankrupts, Mapstraction, OpenLayers... too much informations, project needs to be finished :)
P.S Pamela is still typing, so Google is still holding on :) pamela fox je napisao/la: > You might look into a library like Mapstraction, which abstracts on > top of the various Maps APIs, so that you can easily switch if > something horrid was to happen to one of them (or if their terms > changed). OpenLayers is also an option, as it wraps the Google Maps > API and its own native API. > > - pamela > > On Apr 26, 3:29 am, "neil.young" <[email protected]> wrote: > > marcelo schrieb: > > > > > Solo, > > > > >> anyway, im wondering how you succeed to compare business with world > > >> existing. > > >> you can make agreement with company but with planet, its little harder > > >> i think :) > > > > > It may be a little harder with the planet, but it is the same logic. > > > 6 months ago, you wouldn't have imagined that GM or Chrysler could go > > > bankrupt, but today they are on the edge. > > > You cannot guarantee that Google will continue to exist, or that the > > > Maps API will continue to be supported, though it is likely that they > > > will. > > > > >> P.S sorry, its sunny here in my village and you push me to make jokes, > > >> thank you for that.. > > > > > Enjoy the Croatian sun! ;-) > > > > ...and all this has certainly a lot to do with the Google Maps JS API. > > > > Thanks for sharing --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
