Firefox 3.0.1.0 on winxp sp3 Google: 705 Live: 385 Yahoo: 300 Ran the test a few times, results were pretty much the same. Google is more/less 2x slower than the rest, seems unacceptable.
This sounds like a good 'challenge' for google devs; they should probably get to work on this and earn that paycheck... Just my $0.02 -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of mp- Sent: 2009-05-11 9:17 PM To: Google Maps API Subject: Re: why is google maps so slow compared with live and yahoo when adding markers? Interesting demo I'm using Firefox 3.5beta5 on WinXP. Google completed in 353ms Microsoft Live never completed Yahoo Maps completed in 141ms On May 11, 5:58 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > Am I missing something here? I have basically identical code to > display 200 random markers on google maps, live maps, and yahoo maps. > On any browser I try Google maps is always the slowest. > > Can anyone provide some insight? Or some code to make google maps as > fast as the others. I'd rather stick with Google maps and not have to > re-code everything, but I need my app as fast as possible. > > Here's a link to benchmark the 3 map > services:http://www.quantumsite.com/maptest/google.html --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
