> If it is, it then goes on to show some other random marker > pts[poly_num] instead of the one you actually tested pts[i] - bad. > > The code in the 'hide' part is different again, looks half finished to > me.
your patience astounds me, Rossko. But replacing pts[poly_num] with pts[i] (which I think is what you are suggesting here) and duplicating the "show" part of the function with "hide"variables gets me back to square one - well, maybe square 1.1, with nothing toggling at all. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API V2" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-api?hl=en.
