Right now I'm not even dealing with img tags - I'm just opening the map URL directly in my browser, and it's shrinking down to unreadable size. I've tried a number of different static sizes, from 100x100 all the way up to 1000x1000 - it doesn't make a difference; they all render the same way.
I did just try your suggestion of testing another non-map image and you're correct - it does the same thing. I'll start looking for mobile development sites. Thanks. On Jan 24, 5:49 pm, Rossko <[email protected]> wrote: > It's worth pointing out that you don't actually specify a size for > your <img> tag in your provided snippet, maybe you do in CSS but we > can't tell that. > > Sounds like you are running into this kind of > issuehttp://www.onehat.com/blog/2009/06/blackberry-browser-bug-with-backgr... > You might find if you request a _smaller_ static map it will get > rescaled to fit the width > > Have you tried a different image format instead of the default > PNG?http://code.google.com/apis/maps/documentation/staticmaps/#ImageFormats > > The image returned by Static Maps is just an image, at the size you > specified it. How it gets displayed is up to your page (the HTML, CSS > etc) and the mobile's browser. I don't think you are going to find a > solution in any Google Maps product, you need to be looking for mobile > browser help. You might set up a demo with any random image > 1000x1000 and see what happens, to show it isn't a map issue. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps API V2" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-api?hl=en.
