On Aug 4, 10:45 pm, bratliff <bratl...@umich.edu> wrote: > > If you do, please publish your results. I am guessing the tile based > interface will have more overhead than the OverlayView interface but I > cannot prove it. > OK I will try with the same clustering algorithm for both interfaces and see what's most suitable. However with clustering the rendering time is much less significant than the time to transform the large number of points into a small number of easy-to-display clusters.
I think the most important thing to improve in the MarkerClusterer is better positions for the cluster centers, if you compare it to traditional algorithms like Lloyd's k-means clustering, so it might be a week or so before I've got anything efficient to demonstrate. ... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
