On Aug 3, 10:14 pm, bratliff <bratl...@umich.edu> wrote: > On Aug 2, 9:53 pm, William <william.g...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I haven't yet tried it but I think the MapType interface looks better > > suited for tile based update? > > I am using CANVAS / SVG / VML to build tiles. I am not fetching > images over the wire. I have no URLs to return to the API.
The ImageMapType implementation deals with URLs but the generic MapType interface can be used for any DOM content, with the getTile() returning a Node. I might try the MarkerClusterer with the MapType interface, which would mean modifying the clustering algorithm to work more locally: http://code.google.com/apis/maps/documentation/javascript/maptypes.html#OverlayMapTypes ... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
