On Aug 3, 10:50 pm, William <william.g...@gmail.com> wrote: > The ImageMapType implementation deals with URLs but the generic > MapType interface can be used for any DOM content, with the getTile() > returning a Node. I might try the MarkerClusterer with the MapType > interface, which would mean modifying the clustering algorithm to work > more locally:
If you do, please publish your results. I am guessing the tile based interface will have more overhead than the OverlayView interface but I cannot prove it. At the time I built my OverlayView subclass, the tile based interface did not exist. The code for PolyCluster is essentially the same for V2 & V3 with one huge difference. V2 does not require an explicit event listener. V3 does. It is a design deficiency which Google refuses to fix. I guess people living in Nancy Peolsi's district are oblivious to the desires of the real world. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
