On Oct 5, 5:56 pm, Tim G <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree with Larry, it would be nice if there was some alternate > solution that at least gave you something comparable to v2 > functionality when you use similar classes.
Based on Ben Appletons post: + If there's a lot of demand we can look into allowing much higher + stroke weights, bearing in mind that this may slow down rendering. the best course forward is to create an enhancement request (although I would probably class it as an issue/defect): http://code.google.com/p/gmaps-api-issues/issues/list?can=2&q=apitype%3AJavascript3 and lobby developers for stars... -- Larry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
