Thanks Larry. I'm not sure what I can do on the lobbying front but I'll at least put it in there and keep my fingers crossed.
On Oct 5, 9:14 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Oct 5, 5:56 pm, Tim G <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I agree with Larry, it would be nice if there was some alternate > > solution that at least gave you something comparable to v2 > > functionality when you use similar classes. > > Based on Ben Appletons post: > + If there's a lot of demand we can look into allowing much higher > + stroke weights, bearing in mind that this may slow down rendering. > > the best course forward is to create an enhancement request (although > I would probably class it as an > issue/defect):http://code.google.com/p/gmaps-api-issues/issues/list?can=2&q=apitype... > and lobby developers for stars... > > -- Larry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
