Thanks, Larry. I had already done that last month, but I was hoping that there could at least be some clarification as far as the TOU on just removing the branding from the smaller map for those wanting to create their own implementation, as long as the maps showed the same data (barring zoom difference between the 2).
On Dec 6, 6:27 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Dec 6, 6:20 pm, CroNiX <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I understand and agree with the necessity for not removing the google > > branding from a map. > > > I am wondering if there is any sort of exception for creating an > > "overview" map, like google uses on the main map page > > (maps.google.com), since they are of the exact same map? Leave the > > main map alone with the google branding and text, but be allowed to > > remove it from the smaller overview map? > > > Its very difficult to see a little overview map when the google logo > > and text are in it, which takes up the whole view of the overview map > > making the concept not very useful if a designer wanted to do > > something similar. > > You could vote for this enhancement request (by "starring" it): > > Add overview map > controlhttp://code.google.com/p/gmaps-api-issues/issues/detail?id=1470 > 95 people starred this issue and may be notified of changes. > > Seems like a lot of other people are interested in it... > > -- Larry > > > > > Thank you. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
