On Jan 10, 5:10 pm, Andrew Leach <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10 January 2011 16:40, bratliff <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Sorry. I misunderstood you. I am not sure I see the distinction > > between stitching and juxtaposition. The API "stitches" tiles by > > positioning each with its own <img> tag. I did not mean to imply the > > use of a server to "stitch" tiles. > > Juxtaposition doesn't involve the creation of derivative works. > Stitching implies actually creating a new image from physically > combining existing images.
OK - my mistake. I should have used the term "juxtaposition" instead of "stitching". Either way, it must occur in the browser with static map images sent directly from Google's server. An intermediate server to reassemble static map images is illegal. Either way, serj, check with an attorney. Both Andrew & I are speculating on what might be legal. "juxtaposition" or "stitching" or whatever else you call it is feasible but it may not be legal. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.
