I'm wondering if you could just stick a robots.txt file on the website and decide for yourself?
On Sep 9, 9:24 am, Jason Salas <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Adam, > > Is the content in an IFRAME necessarily indexed? That's always been a > gray area for me. > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:43 AM, Adam<[email protected]> wrote: > > > Surely the fact we can embed waves into websites means a wave can be > > indexed... *in a way* - Not it's purest form. > > > On Sep 7, 10:20 pm, Jason Salas <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> Hi everyone, > > >> Here's something I thought about last night in the car as my technical > >> marketing side took hold...since at the moment waves are "published" > >> to the public Web, I think we can assume that their contained content > >> is NOT spidered/indexed by Google Search. But on the contrary, what > >> are the opportunities down the road for those who choose to run their > >> own wave servers and actually have their data be listed for searches > >> (i.e., educators, government agencies, marketing firms)? > > >> Will/should we be able to toggle the ability for Wave content to be > >> discovered and regenerated in perpetuity (like Twitter), or have such > >> data be hands-off, being inherently messaging of a privileged nature > >> (like Facebook)? > > >> Thought? > > >> Jason :) > >> [email protected] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Wave API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
