@soundlinker So itsnt there a possibility to designate a Wave as public? So that one does not have to get invited to see or even edit the wave? But Im not sure if IFrames are indexed..
On Sep 11, 3:21 am, soundlinker <[email protected]> wrote: > If the spider crawls the src of the iframe it would get the content. > As long as the spider has the credentials to read the contents of the > wave. > > On Sep 11, 12:25 am, Jason Salas <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > That's an interesting take...and would certainly get the job done for > > servers we can directly manage...but for those using the Google-hosted > > Wave server, beyond our control. Hmm... > > > Jason :) > > [email protected] > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 8:40 AM, redthor <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I'm wondering if you could just stick a robots.txt file on the website > > > and decide for yourself? > > > > On Sep 9, 9:24 am, Jason Salas <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Hi Adam, > > > >> Is the content in an IFRAME necessarily indexed? That's always been a > > >> gray area for me. > > > >> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:43 AM, Adam<[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > > >> > Surely the fact we can embed waves into websites means a wave can be > > >> > indexed... *in a way* - Not it's purest form. > > > >> > On Sep 7, 10:20 pm, Jason Salas <[email protected]> > > >> > wrote: > > >> >> Hi everyone, > > > >> >> Here's something I thought about last night in the car as my technical > > >> >> marketing side took hold...since at the moment waves are "published" > > >> >> to the public Web, I think we can assume that their contained content > > >> >> is NOT spidered/indexed by Google Search. But on the contrary, what > > >> >> are the opportunities down the road for those who choose to run their > > >> >> own wave servers and actually have their data be listed for searches > > >> >> (i.e., educators, government agencies, marketing firms)? > > > >> >> Will/should we be able to toggle the ability for Wave content to be > > >> >> discovered and regenerated in perpetuity (like Twitter), or have such > > >> >> data be hands-off, being inherently messaging of a privileged nature > > >> >> (like Facebook)? > > > >> >> Thought? > > > >> >> Jason :) > > >> >> [email protected] Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Wave API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
