That's an interesting take...and would certainly get the job done for
servers we can directly manage...but for those using the Google-hosted
Wave server, beyond our control.  Hmm...

Jason :)
[email protected]


On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 8:40 AM, redthor <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I'm wondering if you could just stick a robots.txt file on the website
> and decide for yourself?
>
>
> On Sep 9, 9:24 am, Jason Salas <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi Adam,
>>
>> Is the content in an IFRAME necessarily indexed?  That's always been a
>> gray area for me.
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:43 AM, Adam<[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > Surely the fact we can embed waves into websites means a wave can be
>> > indexed... *in a way* - Not it's purest form.
>>
>> > On Sep 7, 10:20 pm, Jason Salas <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >> Hi everyone,
>>
>> >> Here's something I thought about last night in the car as my technical
>> >> marketing side took hold...since at the moment waves are "published"
>> >> to the public Web, I think we can assume that their contained content
>> >> is NOT spidered/indexed by Google Search. But on the contrary, what
>> >> are the opportunities down the road for those who choose to run their
>> >> own wave servers and actually have their data be listed for searches
>> >> (i.e., educators, government agencies, marketing firms)?
>>
>> >> Will/should we be able to toggle the ability for Wave content to be
>> >> discovered and regenerated in perpetuity (like Twitter), or have such
>> >> data be hands-off, being inherently messaging of a privileged nature
>> >> (like Facebook)?
>>
>> >> Thought?
>>
>> >> Jason :)
>> >> [email protected]
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Wave API" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to