Hi Again,
I see your point Sam.

The only problem is I can't code in C++, and the plans that I have for this
application would go well beyond the capability of me learning within a few
days.

Also it would mean I would not be able to Bug Fix my own application for a
while and would have to rely on others doing it for me which could be pretty
dangerous.

I don't mind you creating a C++ version of my App, at the moment I am
creating a new GUI interface for the Application.
I will not be able to help you create the C++ version, since I am going to
have to start learning C++ real fast.

I am going to put up some Future designs for the application including an
example Preview of the applications dialog window in the wave :
https://wave.google.com/wave/?pli=1#restored:wave:googlewave.com!w%252BbTKibG6gA.2
 .

Anyway, I will put up the current source of the application within the
next couple of hours.

I wouldn't mind this all being done in C++, but I have to be careful I start
going into something I can't do. I don't want to ruin myself.

Regards,
Oliver Baker

On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Sam Osborne <[email protected]>wrote:

> 1: Ok.
>
> 2: No, not make my own project based on yours, help you to translate it. If
> you turn it into C++ (which, if you can't do, I'll try to do) it'll be able
> to run on Windows, Mac AND Linux.
> I'd be having a look at the VB code, learn how the parts I'm not sure about
> work and what their C++ equivalents are.
> It's simply because of the fact that .net programs cannot be run on Mac or
> Linux, where some Wave users are. You could TRY getting it to run on AIR,
> but I'm not sure how that works :S
> You may want to look at C++ For 
> Dummies<http://samosborneonline.co.cc/Downloads/C++_For_Dummies.pdf>
>
>
> 2009/10/15 Oliver Baker <[email protected]>
>
>> Hi Sam,
>> *Answer to your First Question:*
>>
>> If you read the whole post you will know I have been given permission by
>> Google to (For This Application only) Breach Condition L of  the Google Wave
>> Program Policy until the relative API is released by Google.
>>
>> Which means that there is no current API for what I have done.
>>
>> *Answer to your second question.*
>>
>> I am assuming that you want to create your own project based on my source
>> code???? Seems pretty harsh Sam.
>>
>> The Main part of my application that you probably want to obtain is the
>> part which obtains the information. When the API comes out, my applications
>> source to you that you currently want would be near pointless
>>
>> The source will be put up on Google Code soon (Within 2-3 days) since
>> parts of it have to be re-written. I don't mind you using my source code.
>> But I am trusting people not to pull a fast one on me.
>>
>> Hope that answers your questions.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Oliver Baker
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Sam Osborne <[email protected]
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Ok.. I can interpret VB.net... Ish.. Now I want to know two things:
>>>
>>>    - How did you manage to get the APIs from whatever language they're
>>>    in (Java/Python I think) to VB?
>>>    - Where's the source? I wanna see if I can get the source, translate
>>>    it into C++, and then get it to run in Linux..
>>>
>>>
>>> 2009/10/15 Oliver Baker <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>> Hi Sam,
>>>> The Application is made in Visual Basic .net 3.5 (Yes, I am only 17,
>>>> still studying for a Bachelors and VB is easier than C# and obviously
>>>> C/C++).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Sam Osborne <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> What language is it made in?
>>>>>
>>>>> 2009/10/15 Oliver Baker <[email protected]>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>> I have good news!!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pamela has allowed me to continue developing and displaying my
>>>>>> application using its current "Scrapping" method until the API comes out.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have put the Application back on Google Code and will shortly be
>>>>>> releasing an update which fixes the Proxy Authentication issue.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Oliver Baker
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:38 AM, kim3er <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for clearing that up, I was a bit taken back by the use of the
>>>>>>> word illegal for scraping websites. I suspect that we will start to
>>>>>>> see the nature of scraping change in the near future as websites
>>>>>>> become the API. Pages written in valid XHTML/HTML 5 with meaningful
>>>>>>> naming conventions (like micro formats). I don't think scraping can
>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>> a dirty word anymore. But I can understand the need for a company
>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>> Google to control where and how the bandwidth is used.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rich
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Oct 14, 4:11 am, "pamela (Google Employee)" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> > Sure, good point, let me clarify, though please keep in mind that
>>>>>>> I'm not a
>>>>>>> > lawyer...
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > According to the Google Wave terms of use, it is not permitted to
>>>>>>> "modify,
>>>>>>> > adapt, translate, or reverse engineer any portion of the Service
>>>>>>> unless
>>>>>>> > expressly authorized". In Oliver's prototype, he essentially
>>>>>>> reverse
>>>>>>> > engineered the client display mechanism to extract the content. You
>>>>>>> can read
>>>>>>> > more of the policies at:
>>>>>>> http://wave.google.com/help/wave/program_policies.html
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Once we have an API to let you programmatically extract the content
>>>>>>> -- which
>>>>>>> > is something we're working on -- then that API could be used to
>>>>>>> build this
>>>>>>> > prototype without having to reverse engineer. Another thing to
>>>>>>> consider,
>>>>>>> > more in the wave protocol effort, would be a client/server protocol
>>>>>>> -- but
>>>>>>> > things are early there at the moment.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > - pamela
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Joe Developer <
>>>>>>> [email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 7:42 AM, pamela (Google Employee) <
>>>>>>> > > [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > >> Hey Oliver-
>>>>>>> > >> I responded to you offline, but will also respond here to keep
>>>>>>> the thread
>>>>>>> > >> in the forum.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > >> I assumed that was how you were doing this, but wanted to give
>>>>>>> you a
>>>>>>> > >> chance to explain. It is generally considered illegal to
>>>>>>> "scrape" the HTML
>>>>>>> > >> of webpages that do not grant explicit permission for that. That
>>>>>>> is why
>>>>>>> > >> webpages provide APIs- so that developers can legally use
>>>>>>> content.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > >> Really? Generally considered illegal? I would appreciate a link
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> > > documents such a finding. I would imagine that google search
>>>>>>> results would
>>>>>>> > > be fairly sparsely populated if they could only include those
>>>>>>> pages that
>>>>>>> > > include explicit permission for google to scrape.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > > I would advise on waiting until we offer some sort of Google data
>>>>>>> API to
>>>>>>> > >> distribute a program like this.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > >> - pamela
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > >> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Oliver Baker <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > >>> How dare you Andrey!
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > >>> I do not store any of your information what so ever excluding
>>>>>>> the last
>>>>>>> > >>> Wave server you selected.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > >>> Any Login information you enter is immediatly put into the
>>>>>>> Google Wave
>>>>>>> > >>> Login page to log the application into the Google Wave login
>>>>>>> page.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > >>> To enter your login details on Version 2 (Sorry I made this a
>>>>>>> little
>>>>>>> > >>> stupidly) you will need to left click on the Notify Icon or
>>>>>>> right
>>>>>>> > >>> click the icon, go into the Waves item, then click the login to
>>>>>>> see
>>>>>>> > >>> your waves button.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > >>> Also, make sure you have Google Chrome Frame installed on your
>>>>>>> > >>> computer for this to work. I am still working out the bugs.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > >>> On Oct 14, 10:07 am, Andrey Fedorov <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> > >>> > Uhoh, I hope you guys are at least running antivirus as you
>>>>>>> run exe's
>>>>>>> > >>> you
>>>>>>> > >>> > downloaded online?
>>>>>>> > >>> > - Andrey
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > >>> > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Scott Breakall <
>>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>> > >>> wrote:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > >>> > > I've downloaded the exe, but am I missing something?
>>>>>>> There's nowhere
>>>>>>> > >>> > > for me to enter my wave credentials?
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > >>> > > ~Scott~
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Wave API" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to