Hey Oliver, Did you use the Embed API to make this with it?
This is a great idea. Thanks & God Bless, Eric On Oct 15, 3:49 pm, Sam Osborne <[email protected]> wrote: > 1: Ok. > > 2: No, not make my own project based on yours, help you to translate it. If > you turn it into C++ (which, if you can't do, I'll try to do) it'll be able > to run on Windows, Mac AND Linux. > I'd be having a look at the VB code, learn how the parts I'm not sure about > work and what their C++ equivalents are. > It's simply because of the fact that .net programs cannot be run on Mac or > Linux, where some Wave users are. You could TRY getting it to run on AIR, > but I'm not sure how that works :S > You may want to look at C++ For > Dummies<http://samosborneonline.co.cc/Downloads/C++_For_Dummies.pdf> > > 2009/10/15 Oliver Baker <[email protected]> > > > Hi Sam, > > *Answer to your First Question:* > > > If you read the whole post you will know I have been given permission by > > Google to (For This Application only) Breach Condition L of the Google Wave > > Program Policy until the relative API is released by Google. > > > Which means that there is no current API for what I have done. > > > *Answer to your second question.* > > > I am assuming that you want to create your own project based on my source > > code???? Seems pretty harsh Sam. > > > The Main part of my application that you probably want to obtain is the > > part which obtains the information. When the API comes out, my applications > > source to you that you currently want would be near pointless > > > The source will be put up on Google Code soon (Within 2-3 days) since parts > > of it have to be re-written. I don't mind you using my source code. But I am > > trusting people not to pull a fast one on me. > > > Hope that answers your questions. > > > Regards, > > Oliver Baker > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Sam Osborne > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > >> Ok.. I can interpret VB.net... Ish.. Now I want to know two things: > > >> - How did you manage to get the APIs from whatever language they're in > >> (Java/Python I think) to VB? > >> - Where's the source? I wanna see if I can get the source, translate > >> it into C++, and then get it to run in Linux.. > > >> 2009/10/15 Oliver Baker <[email protected]> > > >>> Hi Sam, > >>> The Application is made in Visual Basic .net 3.5 (Yes, I am only 17, > >>> still studying for a Bachelors and VB is easier than C# and obviously > >>> C/C++). > > >>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Sam Osborne < > >>> [email protected]> wrote: > > >>>> What language is it made in? > > >>>> 2009/10/15 Oliver Baker <[email protected]> > > >>>> Hi All, > >>>>> I have good news!!! > > >>>>> Pamela has allowed me to continue developing and displaying my > >>>>> application using its current "Scrapping" method until the API comes > >>>>> out. > > >>>>> I have put the Application back on Google Code and will shortly be > >>>>> releasing an update which fixes the Proxy Authentication issue. > > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> Oliver Baker > > >>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:38 AM, kim3er <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>> Thanks for clearing that up, I was a bit taken back by the use of the > >>>>>> word illegal for scraping websites. I suspect that we will start to > >>>>>> see the nature of scraping change in the near future as websites > >>>>>> become the API. Pages written in valid XHTML/HTML 5 with meaningful > >>>>>> naming conventions (like micro formats). I don't think scraping can be > >>>>>> a dirty word anymore. But I can understand the need for a company like > >>>>>> Google to control where and how the bandwidth is used. > > >>>>>> Rich > > >>>>>> On Oct 14, 4:11 am, "pamela (Google Employee)" <[email protected]> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > Sure, good point, let me clarify, though please keep in mind that > >>>>>> I'm not a > >>>>>> > lawyer... > > >>>>>> > According to the Google Wave terms of use, it is not permitted to > >>>>>> "modify, > >>>>>> > adapt, translate, or reverse engineer any portion of the Service > >>>>>> unless > >>>>>> > expressly authorized". In Oliver's prototype, he essentially reverse > >>>>>> > engineered the client display mechanism to extract the content. You > >>>>>> can read > >>>>>> > more of the policies at: > >>>>>>http://wave.google.com/help/wave/program_policies.html > > >>>>>> > Once we have an API to let you programmatically extract the content > >>>>>> -- which > >>>>>> > is something we're working on -- then that API could be used to > >>>>>> build this > >>>>>> > prototype without having to reverse engineer. Another thing to > >>>>>> consider, > >>>>>> > more in the wave protocol effort, would be a client/server protocol > >>>>>> -- but > >>>>>> > things are early there at the moment. > > >>>>>> > - pamela > > >>>>>> > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Joe Developer < > >>>>>> [email protected]>wrote: > > >>>>>> > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 7:42 AM, pamela (Google Employee) < > >>>>>> > > [email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>> > >> Hey Oliver- > >>>>>> > >> I responded to you offline, but will also respond here to keep > >>>>>> the thread > >>>>>> > >> in the forum. > > >>>>>> > >> I assumed that was how you were doing this, but wanted to give > >>>>>> you a > >>>>>> > >> chance to explain. It is generally considered illegal to "scrape" > >>>>>> the HTML > >>>>>> > >> of webpages that do not grant explicit permission for that. That > >>>>>> is why > >>>>>> > >> webpages provide APIs- so that developers can legally use > >>>>>> content. > > >>>>>> > >> Really? Generally considered illegal? I would appreciate a link > >>>>>> that > >>>>>> > > documents such a finding. I would imagine that google search > >>>>>> results would > >>>>>> > > be fairly sparsely populated if they could only include those > >>>>>> pages that > >>>>>> > > include explicit permission for google to scrape. > > >>>>>> > > I would advise on waiting until we offer some sort of Google data > >>>>>> API to > >>>>>> > >> distribute a program like this. > > >>>>>> > >> - pamela > > >>>>>> > >> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Oliver Baker <[email protected]> > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>> > >>> How dare you Andrey! > > >>>>>> > >>> I do not store any of your information what so ever excluding > >>>>>> the last > >>>>>> > >>> Wave server you selected. > > >>>>>> > >>> Any Login information you enter is immediatly put into the > >>>>>> Google Wave > >>>>>> > >>> Login page to log the application into the Google Wave login > >>>>>> page. > > >>>>>> > >>> To enter your login details on Version 2 (Sorry I made this a > >>>>>> little > >>>>>> > >>> stupidly) you will need to left click on the Notify Icon or > >>>>>> right > >>>>>> > >>> click the icon, go into the Waves item, then click the login to > >>>>>> see > >>>>>> > >>> your waves button. > > >>>>>> > >>> Also, make sure you have Google Chrome Frame installed on your > >>>>>> > >>> computer for this to work. I am still working out the bugs. > > >>>>>> > >>> On Oct 14, 10:07 am, Andrey Fedorov <[email protected]> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>> > Uhoh, I hope you guys are at least running antivirus as you > >>>>>> run exe's > >>>>>> > >>> you > >>>>>> > >>> > downloaded online? > >>>>>> > >>> > - Andrey > > >>>>>> > >>> > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Scott Breakall < > >>>>>> [email protected]> > >>>>>> > >>> wrote: > > >>>>>> > >>> > > I've downloaded the exe, but am I missing something? There's > >>>>>> nowhere > >>>>>> > >>> > > for me to enter my wave credentials? > > >>>>>> > >>> > > ~Scott~ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Wave API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
