On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Eric Ayers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Miguel Méndez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > LGTM.  Couple of nits:
> > 103 this could be a switch statement
>
> Two of the members turn out to have the same value.  Won't that kill
> the switch statement?
>  MISSING_QUERY and UNKNOWN_ADDRESS bothmap to the numeric value 601.
> Sweet ain't it?  I will document that first...
>

That sure is sweet.


>
> > 34-84 - if you are going to have public static ints, do you still need
> the
> > public accessor methods?  Should those be private?
>
> I exposed these on the conversion to overlays.  I was considering
> dumping the static ints instead.  This would save clinits, but at the
> expense of transparency for the JS Maps API docs.
>
> As a user of the API, I think I would prefer the constants though.
>

I'll trust your judgment on this point.


>
>
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Eric Ayers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Attached the patch file...
> >>
> >> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Eric Ayers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> +GWTC
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Eric Ayers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hello Miguel,
> >>>>
> >>>> This is yet another JS overlay conversion.  The StatusCodes type is
> >>>> really just a collection of constants.
> >>>>
> >>>> D
> >>>> maps/maps/src/com/google/gwt/maps/client/impl/StatusCodesImpl.java
> >>>> M
>  maps/maps/src/com/google/gwt/maps/client/geocode/StatusCodes.java
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Eric Z. Ayers - GWT Team - Atlanta, GA USA
> >>>> http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Eric Z. Ayers - GWT Team - Atlanta, GA USA
> >>> http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Eric Z. Ayers - GWT Team - Atlanta, GA USA
> >> http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Miguel
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Eric Z. Ayers - GWT Team - Atlanta, GA USA
> http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/
>



-- 
Miguel

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to