Oh I wasn't complaining.  It's not an issue at all since FF has session
restore.  Just wondering if it was a known issue & if I should file a bug.

On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 12:08 AM, John Tamplin <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:59 PM, Vitali Lovich <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I'm not 100% sure if this is related to the patch, but I'm seeing an issue
>> in the following situation:
>>
>
> I doubt this has anything to do with the patch -- basically the issue is
> that with the plugin, Firefox is dependent upon the link to the OOPHM server
> since the plugin makes synchronous RPC calls from native code that block the
> UI event loop until it gets a response (since the calls to Java methods from
> JS and vice-versa have to be synchronous).  If that connection goes away, it
> can hang the browser until the OS notices the connection has died.  If your
> TCP connection goes to another machine, then the connection will be killed
> by the other end due to keep-alive being set, but the process running on the
> laptop won't notice for a while after it comes up -- but it should
> eventually come back.
>
> If both the OOPHM server and the browser are running on your laptop, I am
> surprised that there would be any issues here (though frequently after
> waking up everything has to be paged back in from disk so you can experience
> sluggish behavior while that happens), but this is not something that has
> been tested as far as I know.
>
> This is probably a good time to mention that OOPHM isn't the default
> because it has a lot of unpolished edges.  If you aren't willing to put up
> with them or use workarounds (like closing the OOPHM session in your browser
> before suspending if that is causing an issue), then perhaps you shouldn't
> be using it until we get it more polished.
>
> We do want to know about issues such as these, but it will probably be a
> while longer before everything is the way we want it.
>
>
> --
> John A. Tamplin
> Software Engineer (GWT), Google
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to