No pb Joel, now that I better understand the kind of issue you faced, let's say ok to this naming scheme. If I seem to insist it's because this initial design will drive the implementation of all the remaining panels (and the tons of third-party toolkits) Once all those panels will be developed on top of this new API, going backward will be difficult (like the event model in fact...). btw do you know if this new layout model is aimed at being part of the initial release of GWT 2.0 ?
Sami On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 9:30 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2009/09/03 17:50:24, jgw wrote: > > > Committed at r6080. > @Sami: Note that this is not set in stone yet -- let's continue the > discussion about those interfaces in the meantime. > > http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/63801 > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
