Yes, this is definitely going to be a part of the 2.0 release. Which is why I am glad to have all the feedback I can get :)
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Sami Jaber <[email protected]> wrote: > No pb Joel, now that I better understand the kind of issue you faced, let's > say ok to this naming scheme. > If I seem to insist it's because this initial design will drive the > implementation of all the remaining panels (and the tons of third-party > toolkits) > Once all those panels will be developed on top of this new API, going > backward will be difficult (like the event model in fact...). > btw do you know if this new layout model is aimed at being part of the > initial release of GWT 2.0 ? > > Sami > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 9:30 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On 2009/09/03 17:50:24, jgw wrote: >> >> >> Committed at r6080. >> @Sami: Note that this is not set in stone yet -- let's continue the >> discussion about those interfaces in the meantime. >> >> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/63801 >> >> >> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
