+1. there is the possibility of choosing incorrectly since we are not able to look at the parameter type 'passed in' (proposed fix 2 would work on that basis, but is a higher impact change). As Ray mentioned, the safe workaround is to provide a different name.
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Ray Ryan <[email protected]> wrote: > By providing a setter with a different name, I guess. An alternative would > be to provide a new annotation, but that still presumes that they control > the widget source, not much of a win. > > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:11 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> How does the user override the heuristic if it chooses incorrectly? >> >> >> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/993801/show >> > > -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
