ping. On 2010/10/14 19:46:03, fabiomfv wrote:
+1.
there is the possibility of choosing incorrectly since we are not able
to
look at the parameter type 'passed in' (proposed fix 2 would work on
that
basis, but is a higher impact change). As Ray mentioned, the safe
workaround
is to provide a different name.
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Ray Ryan <mailto:[email protected]>
wrote:
> By providing a setter with a different name, I guess. An alternative
would
> be to provide a new annotation, but that still presumes that they
control
> the widget source, not much of a win. > > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:11 PM, <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: > >> How does the user override the heuristic if it chooses incorrectly? >> >> >> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/993801/show >> > >
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/993801/show -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
