http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1414803/diff/1/user/src/com/google/web/bindery/autobean/vm/AutoBeanFactorySource.java File user/src/com/google/web/bindery/autobean/vm/AutoBeanFactorySource.java (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1414803/diff/1/user/src/com/google/web/bindery/autobean/vm/AutoBeanFactorySource.java#newcode32 user/src/com/google/web/bindery/autobean/vm/AutoBeanFactorySource.java:32: * AutoBeanFactoyModel. Please put "this is experimental" disclaimer here and in the javadoc of the other vm packages, along with the package info http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1414803/diff/1/user/src/com/google/web/bindery/autobean/vm/package-info.java File user/src/com/google/web/bindery/autobean/vm/package-info.java (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1414803/diff/1/user/src/com/google/web/bindery/autobean/vm/package-info.java#newcode24 user/src/com/google/web/bindery/autobean/vm/package-info.java:24: * @see com.google.web.bindery.autobean.vm.AutoBeanFactoryMagic "Magic" is gone, right? Might want to grep for it. http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1414803/diff/1/user/src/com/google/web/bindery/requestfactory/gwt/client/impl/AbstractRequestFactoryEditorDriver.java File user/src/com/google/web/bindery/requestfactory/gwt/client/impl/AbstractRequestFactoryEditorDriver.java (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1414803/diff/1/user/src/com/google/web/bindery/requestfactory/gwt/client/impl/AbstractRequestFactoryEditorDriver.java#newcode47 user/src/com/google/web/bindery/requestfactory/gwt/client/impl/AbstractRequestFactoryEditorDriver.java:47: public abstract class AbstractRequestFactoryEditorDriver<R, E extends Editor<R>> Hmm. Seems wrong for RequestFactoryEditorDriver to be in bindery. Should you float another patch to move it back to gwt? Too much work? (I presume the editors don't belong in bindery, at least not until they sprout parallel vm implementations.) http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1414803/ -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
