LGTM

On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 7:00 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Updated the patch, remembering to move the client.impl code into
> autobean.gwt.client.impl.
>
>
>
>
> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1414803/diff/1/user/src/com/google/web/bindery/autobean/vm/AutoBeanFactorySource.java
> File
> user/src/com/google/web/bindery/autobean/vm/AutoBeanFactorySource.java
> (right):
>
>
> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1414803/diff/1/user/src/com/google/web/bindery/autobean/vm/AutoBeanFactorySource.java#newcode32
> user/src/com/google/web/bindery/autobean/vm/AutoBeanFactorySource.java:32:
> * AutoBeanFactoyModel.
> On 2011/04/15 00:51:43, rjrjr wrote:
>
>> Please put "this is experimental" disclaimer here and in the javadoc
>>
> of the
>
>> other vm packages, along with the package info
>>
>
> Done.
>
>
>
> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1414803/diff/1/user/src/com/google/web/bindery/autobean/vm/package-info.java
> File user/src/com/google/web/bindery/autobean/vm/package-info.java
> (right):
>
>
> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1414803/diff/1/user/src/com/google/web/bindery/autobean/vm/package-info.java#newcode24
> user/src/com/google/web/bindery/autobean/vm/package-info.java:24: * @see
> com.google.web.bindery.autobean.vm.AutoBeanFactoryMagic
> On 2011/04/15 00:51:43, rjrjr wrote:
>
>> "Magic" is gone, right? Might want to grep for it.
>>
>
> Done.
>
>
>
> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1414803/diff/1/user/src/com/google/web/bindery/requestfactory/gwt/client/impl/AbstractRequestFactoryEditorDriver.java
> File
>
> user/src/com/google/web/bindery/requestfactory/gwt/client/impl/AbstractRequestFactoryEditorDriver.java
> (right):
>
>
> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1414803/diff/1/user/src/com/google/web/bindery/requestfactory/gwt/client/impl/AbstractRequestFactoryEditorDriver.java#newcode47
>
> user/src/com/google/web/bindery/requestfactory/gwt/client/impl/AbstractRequestFactoryEditorDriver.java:47:
> public abstract class AbstractRequestFactoryEditorDriver<R, E extends
> Editor<R>>
> It's in a "gwt" subpackage? It seems weird to put a RequestFactory
> dependency back in the main com.google.gwt namespace.
>
>
> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1414803/
>

-- 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

Reply via email to