The general idea is to use custom elements + html templates which can be
extended for uibinder like support and/or data binding.

I have been dealing with bugs so I didn't have much progress in that last
weeks; my goal is to make the idea more clear before the end of the Q2.


On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Jens <[email protected]> wrote:

> Kind of funny that I was just thinking about your old thread and Goktugs
> answer that he wants to try some new ways of writing widgets. Just
> wondering if he already came up with something :) I would definitely prefer
> starting from zero without IE 6-8 in mind for new widgets.
>
> I think adding interfaces would be ok, although I am not sure if I would
> ever need an interface for such low level widgets like checkbox, textbox,
> button, etc. They are wrapped anyways in larger views which just have
> meaningful setters to fill them. And using UiBinder you probably also have
> an interface to delegate UI events to a presenter. So what would be the
> added benefit in terms of MVP? I don't have real concerns about adding
> these interface as they dont hurt but I am just curious about how useful
> they really are for developers that already use MVP + UiBinder + Event
> delegate interface.
>
> -- J.
>
> --
> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "GWT Contributors" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>

-- 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to