@Richard Wallis Could you please publish your updated pushstate implementation?
Thank you Michael Am Freitag, 3. Oktober 2014 18:51:51 UTC+2 schrieb Richard Wallis: > > Ok the Historian interface looks like it will solve our issues. I'll > rewrite GWTP's PlaceManagerImpl to use it and update my pushstate > implementation. > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Thomas Broyer <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> >> >> On Friday, October 3, 2014 4:06:01 PM UTC+2, Manuel Carrasco Moñino wrote: >>> >>> There is no plans to upgrade Jetty. It implies some changes in >>> JettyLauncher and WebServer, I have already a patch for that but not >>> committed yet because I have not tested enough. If someone else demands it >>> we could consider to upgrade it. >>> >> >> AFAIK, we can't update Jetty to 9.x because HTMLUnit (used for >> JUnitShell/GWTTestCase) depends on Jetty 8.x APIs (WebSockets) >> There's been a patch proposed already and it has been abandoned because >> of that. >> >> >>> Anyway I think it should be nice not to bundle jetty in the .jar >>> deployed in maven repos, but set it as a dependency so as it's easier to >>> experiment other versions. >>> >> >> It could possibly help with some setups but I doubt it'd be that useful. >> >> If we had a modularized GWT then you could avoid depending on gwt-junit, >> gwt-devmode-jettylauncher and gwt-codeserver (e.g. when compiling) and live >> with Jetty 9.x dependencies in your classpath/buildpath, or we could >> possibly provide a gwt-codeserver and/or gwt-devmode-jettylauncher using >> using Jetty 9.x; so you'd use Jetty 8.x with gwt-junit to run your >> unittests, and you could use Jetty 9.x in DevMode/superDevMode (and benefit >> from Jetty 9.x perf improvements for gwt-codeserver?) >> It's not possible with our current monolithic artifacts (and build) >> though. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "GWT Contributors" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] >> <javascript:>. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/d22e2d8b-0bf1-4f17-9805-9fdb944076f5%40googlegroups.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/d22e2d8b-0bf1-4f17-9805-9fdb944076f5%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/2560e5b0-6f75-4580-b75b-435bd04296b1%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
