I do support Richard's idea. Am Freitag, 3. Oktober 2014 18:19:30 UTC+2 schrieb Richard Wallis: > > Can you not define an interface for HistoryImpl so that we can replace it > while you still keep your implementation private? > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Jens <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > >> Ok so gwt 2.7 is going to provide pushstate functionality so we don't >>> need the 3rd party libraries? >>> >> >> It only uses pushState internally and does not expose any API for it. So >> no, you would still need a library or JSNI to use pushState. >> >> -- J. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "GWT Contributors" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] >> <javascript:>. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/7e26d28b-15cf-497d-b8ae-1deaaf2d7c51%40googlegroups.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/7e26d28b-15cf-497d-b8ae-1deaaf2d7c51%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/306ab4f6-f0d8-4d56-b889-21f4531b6550%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
