Can you not define an interface for HistoryImpl so that we can replace it while you still keep your implementation private?
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Jens <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok so gwt 2.7 is going to provide pushstate functionality so we don't need >> the 3rd party libraries? >> > > It only uses pushState internally and does not expose any API for it. So > no, you would still need a library or JSNI to use pushState. > > -- J. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "GWT Contributors" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/7e26d28b-15cf-497d-b8ae-1deaaf2d7c51%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/7e26d28b-15cf-497d-b8ae-1deaaf2d7c51%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAEqaEViROMyjfNJSgR%3Ds4JPSNY5v0fz4Tot33ArTZf6gkA2bfA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
