Will the new transpiler support the following features and fixes the linked issues:
- "Good" SourceMaps including SuperDebug (see Brians speech at gwt.create) and debugger support within the IDE (like sdbg for eclipse) - StackTraces including emulation mode (for browsers without - like Safari), StackTraceDeobfuscator and closure support (the current one is still broken - see https://github.com/gwtproject/gwt/issues/7800) - "Story of Your Compile" or something similar to optimize and analyze the results of the transpiler Am Samstag, 11. Juli 2015 00:38:11 UTC+2 schrieb Goktug Gokdogan: > > > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Stephen Haberman <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL1yReUCGwGvrqscLu1EAyYRPrr0ceEHLE >>> >> >> Thanks! >> >> I feel dumb, as the gwt-contrib posts were going under the Forums tab in >> my gmail account, and so I missed the original email/thread go buy. I only >> stumbled across this thread later via the web. >> >> I'll start catching up on the videos. >> >> So saying "GWT 2.x is here to stay" really would depend on someone >>> maintaining it: >>> >> >> That is a good point. >> >> >>> But I think we should just stop speculating, wait a bit for Google to >>> continue their experiment with j2cl and have a clearer view of how they >>> want to migrate their existing apps, and then see which features Google >>> would like to port themselves (because they need them anyway) and which >>> ones they'd "abandon", and whether they'll be replaced or not. >>> >> >> That's also very reasonable. Sounds fun! >> >> > Just FYI, we don't have any plans to port anything from GWT libraries at > this moment other than maybe some Resource support. Our only goal in terms > of compatibility is basically having a simple compatibility layer composed > of 'java emulation', JsInterop and Elemental. That layer intends to provide > an option for third party libraries who wants to support both compilers > (i.e. if you write a library that only uses these pieces, it will very > likely work fine in both compilers). > > >> - Stephen >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "GWT Contributors" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] >> <javascript:>. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CANnRKuWXhvbo5MaVpVDkoEwidYWyzkB-HrtKYWuQ-ux86gCZYQ%40mail.gmail.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CANnRKuWXhvbo5MaVpVDkoEwidYWyzkB-HrtKYWuQ-ux86gCZYQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/93be4897-4d97-45ef-bc6e-7c1fba66c8e7%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
