Will the new transpiler support the following features and fixes the linked issues:
- "Good" SourceMaps including SuperDebug (see Brians speech at gwt.create) and debugger support within the IDE (like sdbg for eclipse) - StackTraces including emulation mode (for browsers without - like Safari), StackTraceDeobfuscator and closure support (the current one is still broken - see https://github.com/gwtproject/gwt/issues/7800) - "Story of Your Compile" or something similar to optimize and analyze the results of the transpiler Am Samstag, 11. Juli 2015 00:38:11 UTC+2 schrieb Goktug Gokdogan: > > > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Stephen Haberman <stephen....@gmail.com > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL1yReUCGwGvrqscLu1EAyYRPrr0ceEHLE >>> >> >> Thanks! >> >> I feel dumb, as the gwt-contrib posts were going under the Forums tab in >> my gmail account, and so I missed the original email/thread go buy. I only >> stumbled across this thread later via the web. >> >> I'll start catching up on the videos. >> >> So saying "GWT 2.x is here to stay" really would depend on someone >>> maintaining it: >>> >> >> That is a good point. >> >> >>> But I think we should just stop speculating, wait a bit for Google to >>> continue their experiment with j2cl and have a clearer view of how they >>> want to migrate their existing apps, and then see which features Google >>> would like to port themselves (because they need them anyway) and which >>> ones they'd "abandon", and whether they'll be replaced or not. >>> >> >> That's also very reasonable. Sounds fun! >> >> > Just FYI, we don't have any plans to port anything from GWT libraries at > this moment other than maybe some Resource support. Our only goal in terms > of compatibility is basically having a simple compatibility layer composed > of 'java emulation', JsInterop and Elemental. That layer intends to provide > an option for third party libraries who wants to support both compilers > (i.e. if you write a library that only uses these pieces, it will very > likely work fine in both compilers). > > >> - Stephen >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "GWT Contributors" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> <javascript:>. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CANnRKuWXhvbo5MaVpVDkoEwidYWyzkB-HrtKYWuQ-ux86gCZYQ%40mail.gmail.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CANnRKuWXhvbo5MaVpVDkoEwidYWyzkB-HrtKYWuQ-ux86gCZYQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/93be4897-4d97-45ef-bc6e-7c1fba66c8e7%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
