Hi Lothar,

I can't actually think of a single situation where I myself would design a
web app (or even a desktop app) with 10,000+ tree nodes open at the same
time, and I don't think I've ever come across one while surfing the web, but
if I'm ever forced to build one that the general public might stumble
across, before Firefox fixes its bug, then I now know there is a solution
:-)

Ian

http://examples.roughian.com


2008/10/28 Lothar Kimmeringer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>
> Ian Bambury schrieb:
>
> > I write desktop apps when I have to because I need to use the local file
> > system plus or minus the web, or when I need to eliminate the lag of the
> > net or I need my users to be able to work in a lead-lined box or on the
> > train in tunnels that haven't yet been fitted with an internet link (in
> > the UK, we are starting to see train tunnels with internet links now).
> >
> > So why would would I need both?
>
> Mozilla/Firefox have a huge impact on performance if you have
> trees with many thousand nodes (Safari not). As long as this
> is the case you have some kind of fallback by installing a local
> application instead of using the browser until the issue is
> fixed.
>
> If you have a tree with 10,000 nodes (I'm not joking with that),
> every click on the node needs many seconds until there is some
> kind of reaction.
>
>
> Regards, Lothar
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to