HI All, Thaks for your reply. I got a mail from Kevin Tarun. He has done it. There is a way in ProGuard by which you can specify which methods and classes not to obfuscate. Warm Regards, Allahbaksh
On Dec 10, 4:13 pm, Jason Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The obfuscator should either leave those method alone by default (since > they're defined in an > "outside" interface), or you should be able to configure it to leave them > alone. > > Either way, RemoteServiceServlet uses reflection and thus does need the > method names intact. You may > be able to alter the generated JavaScript code, or config to change the > method names there as well, > but I'm not sure how you would go about this. Easiest just to leave the > method names alone. > > Magno Machado wrote: > > Won't it break rpc? > > Unless your obfuscator keep the names of your services methods, I think > > RemoteServiceServlet won't find them when you make a RPC call. But I'm > > not sure about this.. > > > 2008/12/10Allahbaksh<[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > > > HI Rob and Shawn, > > Thanks for your reply. I am thinking to use ProGuard.Do you have any > > other open source alternatives. Please let me know if you have used > > any other? > > Regards, > > Allahbaksh > > > On Dec 9, 9:35 pm, "Rob Coops" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 5:17 PM,Allahbaksh > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > We are distributing an application. We want to obfuscate the server > > > > side code to the client so that they should not reverse > > engineer the > > > > code. Is it works fine? > > > > > What will happend to servlets? Whether they work fine? > > > > > Regards, > > > >Allahbaksh > > > > HiAllahbaksh, > > > > Obfuscating code is not going to stop any determined person from > > reverse > > > engineering your code, it might make it slightly more difficult > > but that is > > > about it. The code should still work otherwise the obfuscation > > failed and > > > you simply broke your own code. > > > > In the end any and all code you write can be reversed engineered > > regardless > > > of obfuscation or any other technique used to make it harder to > > do so. So in > > > that respect you will have to look at the cost you make > > obfuscating your > > > code as opposed to the risk you run with someone actually taking > > the trouble > > > of reverse engineering your code. How much will you loose if > > someone reverse > > > engineers your code in a week and how much will you loose if it > > takes them a > > > month... you might very well find that the cost of hiding you > > code is not > > > worth the money. > > > > Regards, > > > > Rob --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
