I know *nothing* about licensing, but I've been following this, and I apologise if it's a stupid question but... If you *don't* release a product under a certain licence, then how can it be possibly be a concern if the product doesn't comply to the licence it isn't released under?
Ian http://examples.roughian.com 2009/4/8 Ian Petersen <[email protected]> > > On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 1:32 PM, ginger_ninja <[email protected]> > wrote: > > What a farce. Who cares if it violates the LGPL (besides perhaps RMS)? > > That's a ridiculous comment. Because GWT is released under the Apache > license, I don't understand how this conversation even got started but > if, hypothetically, GWT _did_ violate the LGPL, that's an important > problem. Suggesting that RMS is the only person that could possbily > care is absurd. > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
