still the same bug in the 1.6.4 release !

On 4 mar, 14:47, eneveu <[email protected]> wrote:
> I had the same problem yesterday, and I stumbled on this post. Thanks
> a lot for the explanation.
>
> I opened an issue 
> here:http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=3439
>
> (Will, since your post explained the problem clearly, I took it as a
> basis in the issue's description (changing/adding some details), I
> hope you won't mind)
>
> I wonder if this problem only appears when using maven, or if ant-
> based builds also suffer from it.
>
> -en
>
> On Mar 3, 3:34 pm, Garey <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I am also having this issue.  The workaround isn't hard, but it's
> > annoying and I would rather not do it for every release.
>
> > Thanks,
>
> > g
>
> > On Feb 26, 10:49 am, Will <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Not sure who is reposponsible for the jars deployed to maven, but I am
> > > having issues with the versions deployed there.
>
> > > The1.6.0 and1.6.1 versions of gwt-dev and gwt-user jars contain the
> > > source code for thejavax.servletpackage.  The problem is the source
> > > code has a newer timestamp than the class files. This causes the
> > >javax.servletclasses to be recompiled and placed in our target.
>
> > > Can someone fix the deployed jars to either 1) include class files
> > > having a later timestamp or 2) contain nojavaxsource code.
>
> > > Not sure of the source code is required, the jars for version 1.5.3
> > > didn't include anyjavax.servletsources. I'm leaning toward option 2
> > > since the classpath could contain externaljavax.servletclasses with
> > > older timestamp than sources bundled in gwt jars.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to