Hi Salvador,
Sorry for answering so late, I didn't check this thread in a while.
The code you posted in the pastebin is expired, but here is how we
declared our GWT dependencies:
<dependency>
<groupId>com.google.gwt</groupId>
<artifactId>gwt-servlet</artifactId>
<version>${gwtVersion}</version>
<scope>compile</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.google.gwt</groupId>
<artifactId>gwt-user</artifactId>
<version>${gwtVersion}</version>
<scope>provided</scope>
</dependency>
I was using the googlecode GWT-Maven plug-in (not the codehaus one),
and the issue I had was that Maven saw the javax.servlet.*.java had a
more recent timestamp than the javax.servlet.*.class, and thus thought
it was a good idea to re-compile them and add them to our war (in /WEB-
INF/classes/).
Our war's lib folder did not contain gwt-user.jar, only gwt-
server.jar, since gwt-user's dependency was provided. The conflict was
thus caused by these additional classes in WEB-INF/classes/.
The GWT team fixed my issue by having the same timestamp for the .java
and .class files in javax/servlet. It seems that the fix didn't work
for Cyril and maybe some other people (where Maven re-compiles the
source files even though their timestamp is correct), but I don't know
if it is due to differences between the googlecode and codehaus gwt
maven plugins, or if it is due to some specific maven configuration.
Hope this helps!
Have a nice day,
-eneveu
On 24 avr, 11:32, Salvador Diaz <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't really think this is a bug, as you shouldn't have to include
> gwt-user in your war anyway. That's what the gwt-servlet is for. Does
> including the gwt dependencies in your pom in the following way solves
> the problem ?
>
> See here for the snippet:http://pastebin.com/m5960979b
>
> I'm curious about this so let me know. Thanks
>
> Salvador
>
> On Apr 23, 11:15 pm, "cyril.lakech" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > still the same bug in the 1.6.4 release !
>
> > On 4 mar, 14:47, eneveu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > I had the same problem yesterday, and I stumbled on this post. Thanks
> > > a lot for the explanation.
>
> > > I opened an issue
> > > here:http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=3439
>
> > > (Will, since your post explained the problem clearly, I took it as a
> > > basis in the issue's description (changing/adding some details), I
> > > hope you won't mind)
>
> > > I wonder if this problem only appears when using maven, or if ant-
> > > based builds also suffer from it.
>
> > > -en
>
> > > On Mar 3, 3:34 pm, Garey <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > I am also having this issue. The workaround isn't hard, but it's
> > > > annoying and I would rather not do it for every release.
>
> > > > Thanks,
>
> > > > g
>
> > > > On Feb 26, 10:49 am, Will <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Not sure who is reposponsible for the jars deployed to maven, but I am
> > > > > having issues with the versions deployed there.
>
> > > > > The1.6.0 and1.6.1 versions of gwt-dev and gwt-user jars contain the
> > > > > source code for thejavax.servletpackage. The problem is the source
> > > > > code has a newer timestamp than the class files. This causes the
> > > > >javax.servletclasses to be recompiled and placed in our target.
>
> > > > > Can someone fix the deployed jars to either 1) include class files
> > > > > having a later timestamp or 2) contain nojavaxsource code.
>
> > > > > Not sure of the source code is required, the jars for version 1.5.3
> > > > > didn't include anyjavax.servletsources. I'm leaning toward option 2
> > > > > since the classpath could contain externaljavax.servletclasses with
> > > > > older timestamp than sources bundled in gwt jars.
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
