and what is the opinion of Googlers?
On 29 Wrz, 20:37, Daniel Jue <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 for Maven nested module friendliness.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Iain Shigeoka <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 Maven friendly is ideal. Less ideal but better than current is
> > separation of source and compiled code as the original poster mentioned.
>
> > -iain
>
> > On Sep 29, 2009, at 9:02 AM, Michał Sędzielewski wrote:
>
> >> I agree, it would be nice to have maven structure in GWT 2.0
>
> >> On 28 Wrz, 15:45, logicpeters <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> Can anyone tell me if there are plans to rework the way the
> >>> currentGWTproject structure is configured for2.0? Mxing the source
> >>> and
> >>> compiled code in the /war folder has been a real pain in the butt for
> >>> build scripts and source control. I've been trying to "mavenize" our
> >>> project, and find the various solutions to be un-elegant hacks that
> >>> wind up confusing the structure even more.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
