+1 for Maven nested module friendliness.
On 30 Sep., 08:46, Michał Sędzielewski <[email protected]>
wrote:
> and what is the opinion of Googlers?
>
> On 29 Wrz, 20:37, Daniel Jue <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > +1 for Maven nested module friendliness.
>
> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Iain Shigeoka <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > +1 Maven friendly is ideal. Less ideal but better than current is
> > > separation of source and compiled code as the original poster mentioned.
>
> > > -iain
>
> > > On Sep 29, 2009, at 9:02 AM, Michał Sędzielewski wrote:
>
> > >> I agree, it would be nice to have maven structure in GWT 2.0
>
> > >> On 28 Wrz, 15:45, logicpeters <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>> Can anyone tell me if there are plans to rework the way the
> > >>> currentGWTproject structure is configured for2.0? Mxing the source
> > >>> and
> > >>> compiled code in the /war folder has been a real pain in the butt for
> > >>> build scripts and source control. I've been trying to "mavenize" our
> > >>> project, and find the various solutions to be un-elegant hacks that
> > >>> wind up confusing the structure even more.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
