I still don't understand the need for dart. if it would be cross-compiled so where is the advantage over gwt? in gwt we have the language that we allready know and tools that were worked out over years. if it will be incorporated into browser as virtual machine than just why not to incorporate the jvm? licensing issues?
and another thing - javascript is extremely powerful scripting language. (as far as it is used for scripting -> max 300 lines of code it's flexibility is a real power. when comes to maintaining bigger apps this flexibility occurs to be serious flaw, but it the place where gwt enters the play. as i look closer at DART i start to suspect that probably it is not to replace javascript but to replace java (and so avoid dependence to oracle) but do they think they can provide something better than java which gained its maturity over years? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
