Hi,
I would prefer alternative 2, since it follows the Maven standard
project layout. Personally I sometimes put the .ui.xml and .gwt.xml
files in the src/main/java folder, since it allows for faster
navigation in Eclipse. I guess that is mainly a tooling issue and should
not have any impact on the standard we choose.
For super sources I am not sure what is best, since I dont use them.
Regards,
Stefan
Am 13.11.2012 13:51, schrieb Thomas Broyer:
Hi all,
As some of view may already know, I'm porting GWT to use Maven as the
build system (instead of Ant). I'm also about to "reboot" GWT+Maven
integration (more to come by the end of the week, stay tuned).
As part of this effort, I'm wondering which project structure to use
as the default, "standard" layout for GWT projects using Maven? I'm
particularly looking for advice/preferences for GWT library projects
(such as GWT itself, mgwt, Errai, GXT, etc.), not much for GWT
applications (the one you run the GWT Compiler on).
NOTE: this poll is cross-posted to the GWT and gwt-maven-plugin
groups, please answer only once! (wherever you want)
The question is about where to put files such as: GWT module
descriptors (*.gwt.xml), GWT "processed resources" (*.ui.xml, etc.),
and super-sources.
It comes without saying (for me at least) that Java sources would go
into src/main/java and "public resources" (i.e. the things within
**/public/**, e.g. the CSS and image files from the themes) into
src/main/resources, so the "everything" below only refers to those
other files listed above.
Remember I'm only interested in defining the "standard layout" for GWT
*libraries*, and please think about them as /GWT-only/ libraries, not
the kind with server-side and client/server-shared code!
Note that in any case, src/main/java is also added as a resource
folder (packaged within the JAR)
Here are the alternatives I thought about:
1. everything in src/main/java
super-sources in src/main/resources
2. everything in src/main/resources
3. everything in src/main/resources
super-sources in src/main/super (or gwt-super, or some other name,
let's discuss that later as I suspect it's a bikeshed)
When casting your vote, do not hesitate to explain *why* you prefer
that particular layout over the others, or why you don't like one of
the proposed layouts. Also feel free to propose a fourth alternative.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/npnUeQyrLXkJ.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google
Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
