Well I tried gOS on my system today. I think it will work fine if I get more memory. My current configuration is just 128MB. My live CD took me as far as seeing the pretty green gOS wallpaper and my mouse cursor. At that point I got an error about gnome and then my system just appeared to hang. I assume that if I had more memory, I would have gotten further. Overall the screen looked good and clear. I'm excited, but at the same time while trying gOS today I scuffed one of the corners on my mobo. It kind of chipped off and looks bad. Now I don't know if the mobo will work anymore or not. :-( It is on the extreme corner, and I'm hoping it won't make a difference. However there are two dots of solder right next to the damaged spot. Again what a disappointment. None of this would have happened if some guy at the local computer store hadn't sold me a cheap case. I was having sooooo much trouble with it. It's thin like a pop can. It's the worst case I've seen.
On Oct 12, 3:04 pm, mahjongg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you have enough RAM (512 MB should be plenty, about 320MB (256+64) > Seems to be minimum) there shouldn't be any problem at all. Linux is > very good at supporting older hardware. All hardware, including most > printers etc, will work "out of the box". > > Only weak spot is Wireless adapters. For some there isn't a driver at > all available, for others the driver is written by the Linux > community, without much help (if any) from the manufacturer, and an > additional problem is that many chip-sets need to have firmware > uploaded to them to work, and the firmware is also proprietary, so > cannot legally be copied. For these reasons, sometimes the only way to > get Wireless to work is by simply using the windows drivers with an > "interface program" called a "wrapper" (ndiswrapper for WifI, other > wrappers also exist for other special hardware). The wrapper solution > sometimes doesn't work seamlessly with the network manager, providing > no signal strength details or doesn't support power down recovery. > > Some printers also need proprietary drivers, but Epson, HP and Brother > drivers are mostly covered, except perhaps the very latest models. > > So yes, running the Live_CD is a very good indicator that everything > will work, that is what it was designed to do. > You might not see al the resolutions your hardware can support, but > you can add a program to the menu's to re-configure the screen and > video card later, by using the menu editor. > > Only reason I can think of why the live_CD would work, and you cannot > install, is when you have too little RAM, as running the installer > requires more RAM than simply running the CD. But if you have that > little RAM, even when it wasn't a problem to install gOS it would be > running several applications at the same time. > > The main reason more than 256MB is required lies with GNOME, which is > very memory hungry. This year Good OS will also release other versions > of gOS gadgets, that use less power hungry Window managers, like > Enlightenment and XFCE. I have also heard rumours that they are > working on specific versions that fully support specific netbooks, > like the EEE PC, and are optimised to run on each system. > > On 12 okt, 08:07, Bird_Lover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > If I can run the live CD, is that a good indicator that gOS 3.0 will > > install and run on my low powered 500mhz system?- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "gOS Linux" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/goslinux?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
