thanks again, mahjongg.

yeah, I do see this forum's limitations -- too bad gOS maintainers do
not invest in help and support. that's all Linux is about. I still
think it's gOS is one of the best Linux solutions in terms of user-
friendliness. actually I ditched gOS for the time being -- I'm not
morally prepared to undergo all the anguish of trying to install
anything onto a Linux without a network. might easily turn into a
nightmare with the missing packages and such, and I'll have to reboot
each time to another network-connected OS. br-r-r-r. not for me, not
this time... ;-)

I'll wait and see how they're faring with this gOS project. I hope it
will catch up eventually, and as community grows, so does the testing
base. anyway, at the moment the problem seems to be a terminal one...

thanks again, bye.

On Nov 26, 4:29 am, mahjongg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Question is: how come it is not found in gOS's Linux kernel 2.6.24?"
> That is a question that only the programmers of gOS 3 know, perhaps
> not even they are aware of why your particular driver was left out, or
> does not work, perhaps they just forgot to tag an option while
> compiling the kernel.
> I am in no way imbued with special knowledge about gOS innards, so
> don't ask me...
>
> Nobody (certainly not here) can give you such a step by step
> compendium, the gOS community is simply too small to make it likely
> another user came across the very same problem.
>
> Find a source of information that explains how to install the Linux
> Attansic L1 driver on top of Ubuntu 8.04, and apply that knowledge to
> gOS 3, and it -might- work.3. Perhaps the people at the Ubunto forums
> can help you out better than I can, see:
>
> http://ubuntuforums.org/
>
> On 25 nov, 12:24, Kom-Si <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for your detailed replies, mahjongg.
>
> > I'm well aware that gOS is based on Ubuntu 8.04, I was simply trying
> > to emphasize my frustration at the fact that one Ubuntu version
> > performs just fine on my machine while the other doesn't. And they're
> > just one version apart. I disagree with your statement that 'it is
> > barely supported, even by ubuntu 8.10'. Ubuntu 8.10 recognizes the
> > card well enough, i.e. it displays all its parameters thru System
> > Info.
>
> > I also know that gOS 3 runs on Linux kernel 2.6.24. Now the Attansic
> > L1 SourceForge page you referred me to says the following:
>
> > Thanks to Xiong Huang of Attansic for writing the original vendor
> > version of the driver and for granting permission to make the driver
> > available for inclusion in the kernel. After obtaining permission from
> > Attansic, the driver was initially submitted to the Linux Kernel
> > Mailing List (LKML) on September 27, 2006. After multiple review
> > cycles, it was was accepted for inclusion in the mainline kernel and
> > released as part of kernel version 2.6.21. It is now part of each new
> > kernel released from kernel.org.
>
> > Question is: how come it is not found in gOS's Linux kernel 2.6.24? Is
> > it the result 'throwing away' things for the sake of incorporating
> > more user-oriented features into gOS?
>
> > Be it as it may, my question remains: what do I do to make it work? I
> > think I'd already mentioned that I'm a Linux novice, so even if I do
> > find appropriate source code for the L1 driver I strongly doubt my
> > ability to perform all the motions required to compile it, install it,
> > and (God forbid!) recompile the kernel... :-)
>
> > What I need is clear step-by-step instruction on how to rectify my
> > current predicament, for I'm still keen on making gOS work for
> > me... ;-)
>
> > On Nov 25, 4:00 am, mahjongg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Attansic is a Taiwanese company bought by Atheros, and the L1 is their
> > > Gigabyte PCI express card solution.
>
> > > there is a main page for their linux driver here:
>
> > >http://atl1.sourceforge.net/
>
> > > here is a list of officially supported wired-network cards,
>
> > >https://wiki.ubuntu.com/HardwareSupportComponentsWiredNetworkCards
>
> > > Attansic is unknown, and Atheros too (as wired-network chip-set
> > > maker).
>
> > > On 25 nov, 01:43, mahjongg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > gOS is based on Ubuntu 8.04, not on 8.10, and it will take some time
> > > > before gOS will switch to 8.10, as the fact that Ubuntu 8.04 is a
> > > > "long term stable" is very important for gOS, because it is a "steady
> > > > target", it is hard to build a stable non-official "remix" on a moving
> > > > target like Ubuntu 8.10. The difference why your network adapter works
> > > > will be based on the difference in the kernels used in Ubuntu 8.10 and
> > > > 8.04. After googling for your card it seems it is not "all roses" on
> > > > the driver  side for this card as you imply, it is barely supported,
> > > > even by ubuntu 8.10.
> > > > perhaps someone knows a patch, or maybe its just a matter of using a
> > > > Windows driver and the "ndiswrapper", which gOS does not support ("out
> > > > of the box").
>
> > > > On 24 nov, 17:09, Kom-Si <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Hi folks,
>
> > > > > Installed gOS today. I find it a beauty, best of two worlds, and the
> > > > > best Linux I've seen so far. But it turned out to be the only Linux
> > > > > distro that doesn't see my network adapter (Network manager displays
> > > > > 'no network device' message). Without that the whole gOS becomes
> > > > > pretty useless.
>
> > > > > My network card is: Attansic Technology Corp., L1 Gigabit Adapter (rev
> > > > > b0) on ASUS P5QL Pro motherboard.
>
> > > > > For instance, Ubuntu 8.10 recognizes this card during install. I had
> > > > > to switch back to Ubuntu to write this message.
>
> > > > > Can anyone help?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "gOS 
Linux" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/goslinux?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to